A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national awareness next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their site, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore locations are topic to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, significantly in the sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which can be partially built, is in the correct place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their watch, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, in which views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes since grow to be emblematic in the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect visual evidence in the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Guys entered the water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the website turned The most striking descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even further submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is really a disagreement Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as constructed, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of arranging paperwork, maps, and conditions attached on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to build a household dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline plus the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning circumstances. Nevertheless the human factor stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with each other prolonged after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.